Tuesday, October 19, 2010

i've been thinking about this trevor project "it gets better" campaign a lot lately. something hasn't been sitting right with me, but i haven't had the time to devote too much attention to it. pat asked me for my take on it today and i had a chance to flesh out my thoughts, which turned into somewhat of a rant:
we need to stop promising gay youth that it gets better when the fact is, it does not and will not get better until we have an open and honest conversation about homophobia and how it continues to pervade every social, political, and legal institution in this society. it doesn't get better when gay youth still will not have the right to marry in most states or the ability to serve openly in the military. it doesn't get better when all youth continue to be mocked for expressing a gender or sexual identity that strays from the binary. it does not get better when we teach children that heterosexuality is the default and to love any other way will alienate you from your family, your friends, and your government. it doesn't get better when we reinforce and reward antiquated gender and sexuality stereotypes. it doesn't get better when we justify hate based on religion and relegate a core component of an individual's being to a "lifestyle choice".
you know what does happen? gay youth will develop coping mechanisms because they have to in order to survive. they will internalize homophobia and hate. they will grown up resenting that core component of their being, perhaps suppressing it, perhaps actively denying it. they will be afraid of coming out to their families for fear that they may lose their entire support structure. they will be told that they are being too sensitive when they object to the use of homophobic slurs. they will be told that their rights will be a priority when their so called "allies" on the left decide to make them a priority.
we need to stop promising these kids that it will "get better" when straight folks decide it will. but its not just about marriage and equality. its about hate, and how our society embraces and rewards that hate. we need to challenge every single instance of homophobia, no matter how "insignificant" or "colloquial", in every arena. we need to hold media, the government, and society at large accountable for their homophobic views. we need to stop enforcing the compulsory order of sex, gender, and desire. we need society to understand that these kids will keep killing themselves, that lgbtq folks will continue to be abused, harassed, mocked, degraded and treated as second class citizens unless we do something about it.
as to what that "something" is, i sure as hell don't know. i do know that it starts with education and acceptance, not with an empty promise that "things will get better" in a society where that has not, and will not be the case.

too tired to edit that tirade, but i did find a more eloquent take on the issue that goes deeper:

But none of this justifies a logistical leap to the point of arguing that allowing gays to get married or join the army will somehow make people hate queers, or people they think of as queers, less. When a queer gets bashed, the basher isn't thinking, "I hope this person isn't the married kind because THEY would be all right." The issue facing us is not how to make the bigots love us, but the bigotry they express. Which is to say: twisting and turning gay marriage into a solution for queer suicides is an abhorrent tactic to bolster the cause of gay marriage, on which there is no consensus in the LGBTQ community. The simple truth is that people hate us and will cause us harm. They may hate us because they secretly see themselves in us and are terrified of what that means, or they may hate us simply because they see us as the evil to be wiped out. But they hate us and they will cause us harm. The fact that we might be able to marry will not make a bit of difference to such deep-seated hatred. 

link to full article (its definitely worth a read):
http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/ARTICLE.php?AID=29016

5 comments:

  1. You make a valid point. 2 things:

    1) The operative word for me was always "better." Not "great" or "perfect." I'm not sure if these kids are necessarily concerned with getting married or joining the military; their most immediate concern is to not be tormented for being gay. And it seems that for most of the people involved, "better" is finding a safe space/place to live. Of course it won't be perfect. There are hateful assholes everywhere and this is clearly something that needs to be discussed and addressed. But couldn't we all agree that not being bullied in your school/hometown is "better?"

    2) Call me sentimental, but at the heart of the entire project is a basic message of hope. If we don't say "it gets better," than what do we say? "Prepare for a perpetual downpour of shit?" "You are gay, life is difficult?" I'm all for a honest and open dialogue regarding gender and homosexuality, and I would welcome immediate and rapid change with open arms, but the reality is is that it's not going to happen quickly. Any encouragement we can offer anyone is better than nothing for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. my biggest problem with this campaign is that it does nothing to challenge homophobic attitudes and behavior. as you said, the immediate concern for gay youth is to not be tormented for their sexuality. the problem with youth is, homophobia doesn't necessarily have to do with sexuality. it has to do with conformity and straying from "the norm". in one of the most recent suicides, the child did not identify as gay. he was constantly harassed because the other students perceived him to be. this had nothing to do with the child's ability to marry in the future, it had to do with the transfer of baseless hate and ignorance from one generation to another. the only way to stop bullying is to confront homophobia head on and create an environment where there is zero tolerance, and so called allies back up their words with actions.
    i agree that hope is important. and i do think it is important for people to identify themselves as allies, and to offer a message of solidarity for young people. but how does this campaign do anything to prevent or even address bullying? yes it offers a message of theoretical hope, but there needs to be a basis for that hope. its not enough to just tell gay youth that it will get better when all of the evidence suggests otherwise. wouldn't we be better served by a campaign in which allies pledge to confront homophobia in their every day lives, no matter how uncomfortable or inconvenient? otherwise, what are we really offering these kids?

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're not wrong, but I feel like your criticism should be directed towards existing groups and not necessarily this project.

    The intent of the project has been to create a place where teens "can see with their own eyes how love and happiness can be a reality in their future." It's also a personal project: everyone is sharing their OWN stories about dealing with being bullied. The introductory video had one guy saying "In high school, I was thought I was the only gay kid in the world." From the start, it has been about "I" and "me" (but in a good way). I'm not sure if it's fair to criticize the project for something not being concerned with the "whole" when from the start it has always been concerned with the individual.

    That being said, this puts it on existing groups to step it up and actually get serious about creating zero tolerance environments. And I think your criticism should be directed at them; they're simply not doing enough. Yes, alongside "It Get's Better" there probably should be a "I Won't Be An Asshole" project (please feel free to choose a better title). And I sincerely hope one gets started.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i think we're talking about two different things. i'm not saying that this project is negative or without merit for what it is, i'm saying it could/should do more. this is one of those rare cases where people care about gay rights, and such an opportunity could be seized to deliver a more powerful message.
    as for where my criticism should be directed, i do this shit everyday, tom. i'm in grad school for gender studies, writing my thesis on resources for lgt survivors of DV. i critique literally everything. especially when gay issues come up in pop culture. the trevor project could have been the "i won't be an asshole", and i would still have something to say about it. always glad to be challenged though.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Please don't think I was negatively criticizing you. That was never my intent.

    This might just come down to how I'd personally like to the whole Trevor project work out. I do like their singular focus. In the same vein, it would be worth creating a like-minded, similar project with the singular focus of zero tolerance.

    ReplyDelete